one of ! THE MOST IMPORTANT CIVIL CASE IN AMERICAN HISTORY!

1:25-CV-112, now in Appeal as 25-5259. UPDATE: After the 3 panel dismissed with a bare assertion of the law that can be called nothing less than royal abdication and affirmed the dismissal (with the en banc receiving no response. The Case is now being drafted as a historical claim and a Supreme Court Appeal. Future updates to come.

Why is this the most important case; There are two issues, The first is a petition for redressing's of grievance's,

Submitted to the elect (the Biden\Harris and the Trump/Vance White houses, The Judiciary committee's of the US house and Senate and their members as well as several more elect). The elect (except for the Biden\Harris administration) were served notice of the petition filed in the D.C. superior court (page 64 of the document of the link) and the D.C. federal court, The notices were sent by mail and email and can be seen in the appendix of the D.C. federal appeal (page 64). None replied, calls and vm's were not returned and its been a year.

The issue is a question of our nations right to petition. A recognition of those with ideas and problems, and a public accountability that serves a governement of people better than any other. So if you have issues with the tax rate, the direction the country is headed financially, lack of liberty, crime issues or any reason to state in a public record a matter you can debate. The petition right is the most important right, It is arguably the most important right beside freespeech. But it is no longer treated as it historically was, Where in colonial times and early US congress every petition was treated as a formal request that required a formal response. The practice allowed every citizen a mechanism of accountability and permanent recordation of the petitions and the Congressional responses (House to Committee or Senate). A look at the Annals of congress will show that each petition was treated with utmost respect as a duty. Since it is no longer treated that way. I decided to ensure the entire petition and any response was permanently recorded in the Nations Federal civil miscellaneous docket. But the courts judiciary has had other ideas about maintaining their totalitarian control and avoided giving a ruling. Where they could have recused (and some did) when to fearful to approach such a weighty case, They cowered and acted in bias, avoiding giving a proper opinion, be it issues with me or my political beliefs or some inherent fault in their character and souls that makes them strive for totalitarian rule and oppression of the American people or some unknown, It was avoided and a judicial complaint has been filed... But to seen the filings you can visit the dcd.uscourts.gov website and enter the case number above. If you don't have a pacer account to use the federal courts or review the documents are being processed to be uploaded (some of the dockets have been purchased to courtlistener.com but the clerks have been filing documents oddly and the last filing is too large for pacer to handle it... ) look for the links soon.

The second issue; and the reason the petition was filed. Is an inherent flaw in the principles and ethics of the courts judiciary. Where the title Honorable is attached to their name, and the right to remedy was our nations founding principle... That in the declaration of independence the founders said that all men are created equal and the understanding was that no person should be denied justice. The judges haven't upheld this. Civil courts are no longer a place where a person without legal training and simple mind can come state the truth and pray a judge or jury sees the truth. Courts are now the legal communities technical tyranny. Lawyers and Judges often ignoring the injuries and asserting a new found oppression on the people, Ignoring their oaths and duties and playing the most sadistic game of simon says the world has ever seen. A scale of oppression that completely bans the both the poverty stricken and those of comfortable means from obtaining remedy for a long and ever growing area of injuries. Where the cost of representing ones self in a civil claim can be a few hundred to a thousand dollars in simple cases of assualts caught on camera. Other matters such as negligences or frauds of numerous types such as property, product, medical and legal, government abuse of the people and business matters can cost several to tens of thousands of dollars to litigate. Where numerous parties, depositions, experts, and other factors are required by precedent to force the judges to place the matters infront of a jury; Most Americans dont have it, and the result is a justice system that only serves those empowered by influence of money or voice. This is the abuse of process and oppression of the current "Honorable" judges who sit veiled in a night gown and lie to the American people telling us they are good people serving us without bias to ensure the core principles of the nation are safe. The previous was not so boldly stated in the petition, but the following was. You should also be aware that in this nation the judges dont simply expose us to the victimizers they protect, they also further the injuries of those who dare to approach the closed doors of the courts and demand justice.

They are the greatest evil of our times. The following is a loose explanation and is constantly being refined. But should anyone tell you these matters are untrue perspectives. That the judges and the courts are in good working order the way the founders intended.. Then you are welcome to use the contact info found at the bottom of the home page or the menu bar and I will both show you they are wrong and prove it with data, debate and dissection's of what they told you. Then publish it to this site or as a YouTube show or any way you prefer... You can even remain anonymous. So if you want to live in a nation where the majority of citizens have no legal right to compensation for injuries done to them, then you can leave now. But if the principles taught to you since you started growing teeth tell you that if a deprivation or injury another person without justification is wrong and compensation is always due. Then you agree the law should apply equally regardless of if you believe the laws are wrong or only believe in the most basic natural law entitlements and you should keep reading and show some support so that we can correct the errors of the judges of present and past for the securing of the future.

The issues are simply explained, The state and federal civil (and criminal in some instances) courts have a long practice and precedent of hindering and preventing the poor and unestablished (anyone without at least a thousand dollars or usually more in savings) of America from understanding the laws and using the courts to obtain compensation when injured. For those of mental impairment from injury or defect, the oppression is worse. The following the summary and text of the filings:

The Issues presented are these:

I. COURT LAW LIBRARY INACCESSABILITY PREVENTING AND HINDERING LAW RESEARCH AND LITIGATION. (FEDERAL AND STATE) [asking access be an entitlement of law]

II. RESTRICTED DOCKET ACCESS PREVENTING LAW RESEARCH AND LITIGATION. (FEDERAL AND STATE) [ asking for waivers of fees preventing the poor from effective litigation.]

III. LACK OF A STANDARD AND PROVIDED EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS TO FACILITATE LITIGATION PRACTICE BY PRO SE LITIGANTS. (FEDERAL AND STATE) [asking for creation of a standard and required holdings of legal texts for all federal and state) Court jurisdictions, to ensure fair effective litigation.]

IV. DEPOSITION ACCESS FOR PRO SE LITIGANTS. (FEDERAL) Fed. civil rules have made deposing a costly matter inaccessible to poor pro-se litigants, [asking for court rule changes to ensure depositions are an accessible litigation tool.]

V. THE UNSEALED INFORMA POPERUS FORM. A demeaning endangering exposure of private personal info. Bank Accounts, Amounts, VI. Credits, Debts, property owned by pro-se litigants and their work / private affairs. (FEDERAL AND STATE) [asking these forms are required to be filed under seal]

VI. VICTIMS SERVICES: Current shortfalls to heal the injured and future possibilities. (FEDERAL AND STATE) [ Explaining to the public, that victims services doesn't assist at a set level of standards or provide civil representation.]

VII. LACK OF REPRESENTATION FOR CIVIL LITIGANTS OF SEVERE INJURY AND MENTAL\ DISABILITY. (FEDERAL AND STATE) [asking for research and law to establish a right to justice for those who are ill beyond ability to protect themselves and obtain compensation when injured.]

VIII. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY WITHOUT INSURANCE: Easing burdens, repairing injury, retaining respect, [asking for research to determine what areas of law enforcement insurance can be offered to repair injuries and damages occurring during the performance of duty.]

IX. A LACK OF PUBLIC FORUM TO DISCUSS AND RESOLVE ISSUES OF 6 PUBLIC WORRY AND CRIME OVERFLOW UNADDRESSED. [asking for consideration that research be considered, for government or private entities to create an orderly open public forum for people to address issues of government, crime, need and wishes.]

========================================================================================

The second is the question of the right to petition in the several courts of the nation. The assertion of the petition being dismissed by several D.C. federal court judges, Its now in appeal and since there were some hacking issues and the judges reluctance to either read the documents or\and the judges reluctance to acknowledge the controversial issues of the petition and the right to file petitions in the court.

That is the question, the most important case in U.S. history where the people once had a right to publicly notice their grivances (even to the King) and early congress, discussed the matters also recording them, The right to present the government with a public documented request and allow urging for response. So in events where US elect at Town Hall meetings in front of their constituents promise to act and then ignore the constituents without reason, and when generic replies to genuine issues are repeatedly given without acknowledgment the matters can be escalated to the public to scrutinize and expect of their elect servants.

So how did the three panel judiciary respond, with a response so bare it requires clarification before reconsideration can be asked a testless bald assertion of denial of the civil argument (which was written on a deadline)...

They have denied the American people of this right and done so as to insult the right by giving an unformed opinion, or they are simply avoiding me in a judiciary practice where they say were wearing nities please go away we do not want to deal with the duties of office... Well Im not giving up so easily and expect the treatment of the American peoples rights to be given the high regards its owed... so look for the clarification and reconsideration motion to appear on the docket and court listener and an edit to this article...