THE NATIONAL BALLOT INITATIVE
- 2 days ago
- 2 min read
THE RIGHT TO PRESENT BILLS FOR VOTING BY THE CITIZENS OF THE USA TO HAVE LAWS ENACTED BY THE US CONGRESS..
IN STATES ACROSS THE NATION THERE EXISTS A RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO GET PETITIONS SIGNED AND AT A THRESHOLD, THOSE LAWS ARE THEN VOTED ON BY THE PEOPLE, THE PUREST FORM OF DEMOCRACY (THOUGH I HAVE NOT HEARD OF A STATE WHERE THE LAWS ARE NOT MODIFIABLE BY THE LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE BRANCHES)...
WHILE LAWS CREATED BY THE CITIZENRY CAN BE IN ERROR OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND LAWS OF THE NATION AND STATES, ITS NOT THEIR DEFICIENCYS THAT MUST BE CORRECTED ON OCCASION, ITS THE DISREGARD THE PARTIES HAVE FOR THE PEOPLE IN ISSUES WHERE THE PARTIES IGNORE THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND ALLOW DEFICIENCIES TO EXIST WITHOUT CORRECTION....
BUT THIS SHOULD NOT DETER THE RIGHT, THE RIGHT SHOULD BE GIVEN ITS DUE HEARINGS AND PLACE IN GOVERNMENT PRESENTMENT EVEN BEFORE ACHIEVING THE SET NUMBER OF SIGNATURES TO MEET THE THRESHOLD OF GOING ON THE BALLOT AND TO ENSURE IT IS ALTERED TO ITS NEAREST PERFECTION PRIOR TO BALLOT PLACEMENT...
ALL THIS IS TO SAY, WE SHOULD ESTABILSH THE SAME RIGHT FOR NATIONAL BALLOTS; SO ISSUES OF INSIDER TRADING (AND THE WORSE PRACTICE OF CONGRESSIONAL DECISONS ON WHO GETS CONTRACTS ((NOT THE SPECIFICS OF NATIONAL SECURITY WORKS, BUT THE GENERAL SERVICES AS THEY ARE ALREADY PUBLICLY PUBLICIZED)) THIS IS WHERE THE PARTIES AND THEIR MEMBERS EXHERT THE MOST PERVERSE FORCES UPON THE PEOPLE, NOT IN SIMPLE INSIDER TRADING, BUT IN THEIR PRIVATE SELECTION POWER THAT FACILITATES INSIDER TRADING. THAT IN MATTERS OF INVESTIGATIONS BY CONGRESS, THESE TOO SHOULD BE MATTERS OF NATIONAL VOTE, TO ENSURE THAT ACTS BY CONGRESS IN ILLEGALITY ARE NOT IGNORED BY THEIR PARTIES AND THEIR PARTY CONTROLLED ETHICS REVIEWS COMMITTEES...
SO IN THIS RUFF DRAFT, CONSIDER WHAT OUR RIGHT SHOULD BE AND WHAT CAUSES THIS RIGHT TO BE OF NECCESITY... THIS DRAFT WILL BE REWRITTEN TO MORE CONCISELY AND SPECIFICALLY STATE WHAT IS NECCESSARY TO OBTAIN THIS RIGHT, WHICH WOULD I BELIEVE REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT TO THE US CONSTITUTION.
OF NOTE: IN PASSING A LAW, I WOULD CONSIDER THAT A SIMPLE LAW WOULD BE DIFFERENT THAN AN ACT OF CONGRESS, SUCH AS ENDING A WAR WHERE THE THRESHOLD SHOULD AND WOULD BE GREATER THAN A SIMPLE AFFIRMATION OF A RIGHT (51%) AND AN ACT OF THE PEOPLE MIGHT REQUIRE AN (80%) APPROVAL...
THESE NOT ONLY SHOW THE CONGRESS WHERE THE PEOPLE OF THE NATION TRULY ARE, IT ALSO SHOWS THEM WHERE WE EXPECT THEM TO BE.



Comments